Friday, March 11, 2011

Naked Cowboy Vs. Naked Cowgirl



Naked Cowboy loses lawsuit against Cowgirl

NEW YORK - Better luck next time, Cowboy. Robert Burck, the Secaucus resident better known to visitors of Times Square in New York as the Naked Cowboy, has lost his case against Sandy Kane, better known as the original Naked Cowgirl, according to “Metro New York.” Burck, who has branded and created a franchise out of his Naked schtick, filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against Kane last year, alleging that she had to pay him royalties for calling herself the Naked Cowgirl and donning a get-up similar to his own well uniform that includes cowboy boots, a cowboy hat, underwear, and an acoustic guitar. Burck had sought $5,000 in royalties from Kane. But according to “Metro New York,” the duo reached a legal settlement last month and under the agreement Kane won’t have to pay the Cowboy a dime. Burck owns the rights to the Naked Cowboy/Naked Cowgirl name and began franchising his brand last year to protect his brand and its image. In an interview with the Secaucus Reporter last year, Burck stated that he found Kane’s street act rude and unwholesome because she apparently flips people the bird and uses foul language. He said he tried to get her to clean up her act and come into the official “Cowboy” fold as a franchisee. When she refused, he slapped her with the lawsuit. Under their February agreement Kane will continue to perform as the Naked Cowgirl.

I really don't care about these two whackjobs all that much and here's why: First of all, they're not NAKED! This is false advertising. Deceitful. Misleading. If you say you're naked, get naked. Second of all, the Not-Naked Cowgirl is ugly as a bucket of busted assholes. Just nasty. I wouldn't want my picture taken with either one of 'em. Probably break the freakin' camera. Bang. Pay attention!